Translate this Page

Search :

Welcome to Clash of Steel!


Featured battle : Siege of Port Arthur

Part of Russo-Japanese War

Date : 01 August 1904 - 02 January 1905

The Japanese Army attacked then laid siege to the important Russian sea-base of Port Arthur where the Pacific Fleet was stationed. The over-estimated the ease with which the position could be taken and suffered heavy casualties, but once the heights overlooking the town were taken, the Japanese could use heavy artillery to sink the ships in the bay and destroy the Fleet. Once the fleet was gone, Maj-Gen Stoessel saw now point in holding out (even though he possessed plenty of stores) and surrendered. The siege pre-figured the coming world war, in that it saw the use of heavy artillery, trench warfare and barbed-wire entanglements, and machine guns.

Featured image :

Cavalryman's Back and Brest of the English Civil War period

Cavalryman's Back and Brest of the English Civil War period

This English breastplate and backplate from the mid 17th century illustrates the basic protection considered necessary for a soldier of horse of this period. The breastplate is musket-proof (see the small dent or proof mark just the the right of centre) but is quite heavy. The back is much lighter as it is only expected to protect against sword blows during the melee.

Gallery updated : 2022-04-04 08:33:43

Featured review :

The Great Waterloo Controversy.

Gareth Glover
Another classic Gareth Glover about the battle of Waterloo but this book is firmly focussed on the 52nd Foot. There is a little about the regiment prior to the battle and slightly more about them up to the end of their time in France after the fall of Paris. The 52nd became the Oxfordshire & Buckinghamshire Light Infantry notably going in gliders to hold Pegasus bridge on D-day, WW2.
The controversy referred to in the title is around the defeat of the Imperial Guard in the final stages of the battle. So many accounts present the myth that it was the foot guards alone who achieved this. Glover expertly and conclusively destroys the myth, explaining on the way how it came into existence, and replaces it with the best available evidence of what really happened. The author qualifies his reliance on first-hand accounts by the nearness in time to the event that the account was written and the proximity to the action of the various writers. A large part of the accounts are included in the text. The last two chapters and the appendices are an excellent summary of what is in effect a mass of primary data.
There are some useful maps, a nice set of photographs and an extensive bibliography.
We highly recommend this book which, as well as being a jolly good read, is also a lesson in battle history writing.

Frontline Books, 2020

Reviewed : 2021-08-27 09:26:07